Comments for PeachFuzz

Comment on Optimizing Peachtree Performance, Part 1 by Greg Bayard

Greg Bayard — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:29:56 +0000

We are running Peachtree Quantum 2009 and the performance has always been barely acceptable. Generally we have users RDP to the server for large reports. I’d love to hear about your suggestions for optimizing the Pervasive SQL engine. While I agree we have a lot of users for Peachtree (~7) and a lot of inventory items (10,000+), we have other applications that use MySQL for the back end and contain far more than 10x the amount of data yet process per item reports 10x faster. We run a gigabit network and computers average 350Mbps reading from the server (which is a RAID 5 array with Windows Server 2008 32 bit and 4GB RAM), so I doubt the network/server hardware is the problem. I’d run more RAM and 64 bit Server 2008, but I keep hearing about bad Peachtree behavior in that environment. We would upgrade to 2010, but other businesses we know who have complain about similar performance issues.

Comment on Financial Management 101 by Alan Phillips

Alan Phillips — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:09:55 +0000

You did a greeat job with this material. Thanks.

Comment on Automating Your Peachtree Backups by Ben A

Ben A — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:00:50 +0000

IT Solution Providers here… great recommendations on backups by TriStar Data Systems! In my opinion, one can never have enough backups, especially with “bankrupt data”, or what data you absolutely have to have, should the business sustain a disaster or have to close its doors. A company’s financials is at the center of that dataset, and as an example, no client of ours will be without at least 2 or 3 different kinds of backups of that kind of information.

Comment on Peachtree Quantum Splits from the Pack by Andrea Moe

Andrea Moe — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:51:51 +0000

Very nice write up on Peachtree Quantum 2010! Thank you.

Andrea Moe
Product Management & Marketing