<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing Peachtree Performance, Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tristardatasystems.com/Peachtree/blog/index.php/2009/08/optimizing-peachtree-performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tristardatasystems.com/Peachtree/blog/index.php/2009/08/optimizing-peachtree-performance/</link>
	<description>Fruitful commentary on Peachtree Accounting from TriStar Data Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Bayard</title>
		<link>http://tristardatasystems.com/Peachtree/blog/index.php/2009/08/optimizing-peachtree-performance/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Bayard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tristardatasystems.com/Peachtree/blog/?p=83#comment-50</guid>
		<description>We are running Peachtree Quantum 2009 and the performance has always been barely acceptable.  Generally we have users RDP to the server for large reports.  I&#039;d love to hear about your suggestions for optimizing the Pervasive SQL engine.  While I agree we have a lot of users for Peachtree (~7) and a lot of inventory items (10,000+), we have other applications that use MySQL for the back end and contain far more than 10x the amount of data yet process per item reports 10x faster.  We run a gigabit network and computers average 350Mbps reading from the server (which is a RAID 5 array with Windows Server 2008 32 bit and 4GB RAM), so I doubt the network/server hardware is the problem.  I&#039;d run more RAM and 64 bit Server 2008, but I keep hearing about bad Peachtree behavior in that environment.  We would upgrade to 2010, but other businesses we know who have complain about similar performance issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are running Peachtree Quantum 2009 and the performance has always been barely acceptable.  Generally we have users RDP to the server for large reports.  I&#8217;d love to hear about your suggestions for optimizing the Pervasive SQL engine.  While I agree we have a lot of users for Peachtree (~7) and a lot of inventory items (10,000+), we have other applications that use MySQL for the back end and contain far more than 10x the amount of data yet process per item reports 10x faster.  We run a gigabit network and computers average 350Mbps reading from the server (which is a RAID 5 array with Windows Server 2008 32 bit and 4GB RAM), so I doubt the network/server hardware is the problem.  I&#8217;d run more RAM and 64 bit Server 2008, but I keep hearing about bad Peachtree behavior in that environment.  We would upgrade to 2010, but other businesses we know who have complain about similar performance issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
